You can pre-order and get yours reserved for $9.99. Or get a subscription for all 6 bimonthly issues for just $49.99.
In order to be truly happy, you have to be happy (and healthy) on several levels. The best way to accomplish this is with solid information so you can make informed decisions about your life, your body, your rights, and your peace of mind in this crazy, hectic world.
AW Magazine will be a digital publication, readable on any computer or mobile device. The premiere August/September issue will be released in August 2014.
An extension of AW Blog and AW Radio, AW Mag is an in-depth look at various topics for women (and men!), including sex, health, fitness, nutrition, feminism/activism, original erotica, guest writers, spirituality, reviews, and more!
The August/September 2014 issue will feature articles and interviews on the topics:
- Body image
- California women’s Reiki healing center
- Radiant pleasure
- Finding our way back from patriarchy
- Goddess-based spirituality
- The new Atheism
- Classical Tantra
- Activist film festivals
- Revolutionary Feminism
- Painting female nudes
- Healing yourself through meditation
- Knowing your vagina
- Massage & the importance of touch
- Breast Health
- Protecting your clit
- Orgasm tips
- New AskTrish letters
- Sexual health
- Overall nutrition
- Original erotica
- Guest articles
- OpEd pieces
- AND MORE!
Every issue will have new articles, new guests, new important health coverage, and new original erotica!
And please SPREAD THE WORD by sharing the link to this blog post. Thank you!
July 16, 2014 | Categories: #WarOnWomen, #WhereAreTheWomen, activism, AW Radio, awakening, body image, breasts, bullying, communication, consciousness, DailyOJ, erotica, Health, journey, LGBT, matriarchal, meditation, misogyny, multiple orgasms, NEWS, Nutrition, OpEd, patriarchal religion, politics, Recipes, reclaiming sexuality, reiki, relationship, religious oppression, reproductive rights, review, sexual health, spirit, Tantra, women's circles, women's health, women's rights, women's sexuality | Tags: activism, atheism, equality, erotica, feminism, fitness, goddess, Health, LGBT, magazine, massage, News, newsstand, nutrition, orgasm, recipes, sexual health, sexuality, spirituality, touch, wicca, witchcraft, women | Leave a comment
If you judged the average person’s sex habits by what you see online, you’d think everyone is into pain, BDSM, and hog-tying their sex partners into elaborate rope configurations. A while back, I was “roped” into a brief Twitter war with a guy who was trying to justify putting duct tape over a woman’s mouth during sex. You can well imagine I went Irish war queen on his ass.
Personally, I don’t understand why anyone would want to associate pleasure with pain, even though I’ve heard some pretty wild concepts. And I’m not talking about the fur-lined handcuffs, blindfolds, and feathers — although I’d never do the handcuffs or the blindfold. Even without a fetish being involved, women put up with painful sex for a variety of reasons, and we don’t have to. Ever.
One reason I did not go the official “sex educator” route was because I would not have been allowed to speak my mind on the sex habits I personally find to be dangerous or just plain stupid. (Yes, I know…. two consenting adults, blah, blah, blah….) Since the rise of 50 Shades of Grey, it has become politically incorrect to say anything critical about BDSM or bondage or a woman not being a doormat for an abusive man. And plain ol’ sex is considered “vanilla” sex, not exciting or amazing, just vanilla. However, I feel the need to speak out for those of us who like our sex to be solely pleasurable between partners who are on an equal basis, not one person in control nor one person made to be a slave or subservient caricature.
From my own holistic, Tantric perspective, I would never enter a sexual experience with any attitude other than love, equality, and respect.
And yet, pain is apparently all over modern sex. Personally, I believe the association of sex and pain is due to this patriarchal society that is based on hierarchy and competition at any cost. The need for control or recognizing we are being controlled is incorporated into every aspect of our lives, our work, our economic status, our cultural/class status; and then hierarchy and the need for control or to relinquish all control crosses over into sex.
Pain is pain, not pleasure. Women should not put up with painful sex, but often times, we do so as not to hurt the man’s feelings. We endure all sorts of emotional pain throughout our lives, but sex should be 110% pleasure. Women, you do not have to tolerate painful, unfulfilling sex. Ever.
Sex should never hurt. Except for some slight pain when the hymen is broken, sex should never be painful. Even for an experienced woman, penetration can be painful if she is not lubricated enough. Whether it’s your first time with a man or the hundredth, sex may need to be slow to take him in. Just because you’ve been with him before doesn’t mean your body is automatically ready to be penetrated. Being penetrated too quickly or without enough lube can be very, VERY painful.
Remember that the vulva needs to be massaged and stretched as part of the preparation for sex. Another reason for spending time arousing the woman is that the vagina is only 3 to 3.5 inches long, but she expands up to 50% during arousal. So if the man wants to get 5+ inches of his penis inside instead of just 3 inches, fully arousing a woman is time well spent.
The difference in penis size to vagina size can make for thrilling orgasms or a painful experience. If the man has a large penis, extra time may need to be taken to avoid hurting the woman. How much time? This depends on the woman. In this way, yes, the woman is always in control of the sex. That’s just the way it goes, guys.
Once aroused, the woman’s erectile tissue will be fully infused with blood (just as the man’s erectile tissue fills with blood), and for the woman, when the man slowly slides inside the vagina, it is exquisite pressure and a sense of being absolutely full, as if he’s touched her soul. Again, any man not willing to patiently await a woman’s full arousal doesn’t deserve to be anywhere near a vagina.
Encouraging pain to feel pleasure is just stupid — or even dangerous if your partner wants to try something like erotic axphxiation (choking to make orgasm “stronger”). If you actually know the “how” of orgasm, you’d know that oxygen feeds orgasm intensity and duration, so cutting off your oxygen supply is actually not a good idea. And about 1,000 people die per year from erotic axphyxiation.
Pain in the vagina, anus, or even in the pelvic floor or legs could be a sign of something very wrong. If you experience pain or numbness in the legs during or after sex, this may be not only a neurological issue but also a respiratory issue. Getting enough oxygen into your lungs, and ergo your body, is crucial for proper function of the body and especially for orgasm. During sex, focus breathing down into your pelvic floor. As you inhale, bring the air all the way down toward your genitals. This will ensure that you are belly breathing and not breathing only in the upper chest. Upper chest breathing doesn’t allow the body to get rid of as much carbon dioxide, so the body is not being fully oxygenated. This can contribute to the tingling or numbness in the legs. Also, being sedentary in your daily life or job can affect the nerves and bloodflow in the legs.
Moving around to the backside, anal sex should NEVER hurt. Ever. Whether fingers, a toy, or a penis, anal sex should only ever be pleasurable. Men, please know, that male prostate stimulation is very healthy for you, and any anal stimulation should always be pleasurable.
With the possible exception of breaking the hymen, no part of sex should ever hurt. Ever. Never.
Yes, I know that fetishes like spanking and rope-tying have hit the mainstream, but it is still a power-play of control and inflicting pain on someone you supposedly care about. Just because you interpret both pain and pleasure in the same area of the brain doesn’t mean you need to inflict pain to experience pleasure. In fact, if you are, then you only experience sex on a physical level, and orgasm is a response of the subtle body, not just a “release” of the physical anatomy.
The rise of pain as a means of pleasure is more patriarchal bullshit that women are supposed to adopt as “normal” sex play. Women are throttled by the neck, their breasts are slapped, their vulvas punched with a partner’s fist, and it makes me ill. What’s worse is that young people see the images, gifs, videos, etc., online and think that abusive sex is normal, and it is not.
Once you understand the mechanism and response of orgasm, you will know that pain should never be anywhere near sex. Any desire for pain during sex is a sign of other psychological and/or emotional issues that need to be resolved outside the bedroom. I know this is not a popular sentiment, and that’s okay. I want to be a voice for all those women (and men) who instinctively do not want pain-fetishized sex but feel pressured into accepting it because of this society that regularly features victimized women and abusive men as part of the mainstream culture.
Having lived in a patriarchal world and been affected by its brutality more times than I care to acknowledge, I will never allow an abusive person into my sex life. Ever.
- Contact Trish for a consult
- Sign up for the ArousedWoman newsletter
- Take the ArousedWoman Orgasm Questionnaire
January 21, 2014 | Categories: activism, breasts, bullying, communication, connection, male perspective, men, misogyny, OpEd, penetration, reclaiming sexuality, relationship, sexual abuse, vulva, yoni | Tags: BDSM, bondage, fetish, numbness in legs, pain, painful sex, rope, sex, Twitter | 5 Comments
I recently saw the initial release of a new how-to video series, “Oral Sex for Her Pleasure”. I would have assumed that such a women-centric company like OneTaste would have created a cunnilingus how-to, but they have done the unexpected by creating a video that explains how a woman can receive pleasure from giving a man fellatio. I can heartily recommend this video to any man or woman who wants to learn a little more about how women can truly enjoy giving oral sex.
Now, this is certainly not news to me — I orgasm just thinking about giving a man head. Spontaneous orgasms just hit. I love the feel of my mouth being full with a man’s penis. The taste, the smell, the texture. I absolutely love it. And the truth is, when a woman gives great head, she owns the man. Seriously.
Whenever I give a man oral sex, I always tell him emphatically, “Lay back. This is for me. If you enjoy it, that’s a side benefit.” I have always loved giving fellatio, or as I call it lingam puja (penis worship). Even in the midst of a miserable marriage, I still loved giving oral sex. I figured out that giving him a blow job once per week meant he didn’t complain about bills. And while I loathe the term “blow job”, that time of my life is the only time oral sex felt like a job — a chore, and yet I still loved the act of fellatio itself, even though I detested the man attached to the penis.
The concept behind the “Oral Sex for Her Pleasure” video and corresponding training materials hinges on the fact that women can indeed enjoy giving men oral sex. If she doesn’t want to do oral sex or has a negative perspective due to bad experiences, then she might want to see how much pleasure she can have from it. The first step in a woman receiving pleasure while giving head is realizing that the woman has to want to give head.
Now, before you cry, “That’s male bullshit!”, I understand if you haven’t always (or ever) enjoyed oral sex. Cultural and religious demonization of sexuality, women, women’s bodies, and women’s sexual pleasure have brainwashed society for over 1,700 years, since the rise of imperial patriarchal religion crushed the remaining woman-centic goddess cultures. Women have absorbed this anti-sex and anti-pleasure propaganda, compounded by bullying about how women smell “down there”, and the ludicrous farce of how women are portrayed in most porn. Erotica is woman-centric and respectful of women. And we are a new generation of women who love ourselves and love sexuality without shame or apology!
Some things you will LOVE about this how-to video:
- It’s only $8.
- The woman is not a size 2.
- Her breasts are real.
- The man is UNcircumcised!!! Yes, a real, natural, intact penis!!! Woo-hoo!!!
In fact, she almost apologizes that, at the beginning, his penis is soft. So allow me to say for once and for-fucking-all — the SOFT penis is a marvelous thing! In Tantra, we have several nifty positions and activities for the soft penis, including soft entry penetration (yes, the man enters the vagina with a soft penis) and lingam massage, which is best done with a soft penis to help direct energy flow up into the torso, arms, and legs, rather than out the tip of the penis (helps with ejac control, too). So starting an oral session with a soft penis is fantastic because you get to experience how his body feels as the penis changes in size and hardness. (You control him.)
Back to the video…. She talks about her experience in learning to love oral sex. She also tells the good, bad, and ugly of what intense oral sex does for the woman, including the “furrowed brow” which is a tale-tell sign a woman is in orgasm, the deep-throating technique, as well as the steady stream of “snot” from her nose and the “spot” in the woman’s mouth that triggers orgasms throughout her body. Yes, you will absolutely see the “snot” running out of her nose. Yes, you see her crying several times from the intensity of the orgasms. I’ve written plenty of times here about how the more gut-wrenching my crying is directly equates to the intensity of my orgasm(s). Crying is an integral part of my orgasmic experience, so it’s great to hear other women talking about this topic as well.
As for the “snot”, I would like to clarify that she is not referring to the thick, gross “snot” of a sinus infection, but rather the normal sinus muscosa you have draining down the back of your throat 24/7. This mucosa is a necessary moisturizing lubricant for the back of the pharynx (very back of the mouth, top of the throat). In fact, when you don’t have this normal nasal drip, you may experience a dry cough or have clogged sinuses. So this mucosa is what she has dripping from her nose — but that’s okay! Vaginal fluids are also a type of mucosa (derived from the plasma from the blood in the vaginal walls’ muscular tissue), and men LOVE lapping it up! So let the snot run! After all, when your mouth is full of penis, the only way the snot can go is out your nose (or your ear, but that would take a miracle of physics).
Another thing you’re likely to notice in her technique is that she is actually quite still — remember me talking about slow sex? In Tantra, there is a technique of motionless sex — yes, motionless! The oral technique as shown in the video will help any woman out there who’s gotten whiplash bobbing her head up and down while giving a blow job. (Again, most porn is ridiculous). If you want to learn some groovy info and techniques, watch this how-to.
I can definitely recommend this affordable $8 video that can introduce you to the amazing world of women’s pleasure as instructed in “Oral Sex for Her Pleasure”. I give my full approval of the information in this video and all the products they have. THEY LOVE WOMEN! And when you’ve seen it, come back here, and leave a comment telling me what YOU think of the video!
December 7, 2013 | Categories: anatomy, bullying, circumcision, cunnilingus, ejaculation, erection, erotica, fellatio, female prostate, film/video review, fluids, hands, juices, kissing, male orgasm, men, moaning, multiple orgasms, OpEd, patriarchal religion, penis, sacred sex, sacred space, slow sex, Tantra, techniques, training, women's sexuality | Tags: anatomy, bullying, cunnilingus, erotic, erotica, fellatio, how-to, OneTaste, oral sex, orgasm, penis, pleasure, technique, training, video, women's sexuality | 5 Comments
© 2013 by Trish Causey. All Rights Reserved.
In my current class on Methods of Inquiry, one topic that came up is the ethics of the social sciences and research. My professor shared a power point presentation from a friend of hers, and in it, various points were made in regard to research on human subjects. The Nuremberg Doctors’ Trials, the Tuskegee syphilis scam research project, and the Stanford prison study all contributed to the passing of the National Research Act of 1974. This act allowed for the creation of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, which helped establish certain guidelines for conducting tests and research on human beings:
- Voluntary Participation
- No Harm to Participants
- Informed Consent
- Protection of Vulnerable Populations
- Honest Reporting of Results
Of course, I had to bring up the human rights violation that is routine infant circumcision. Circumcision itself is not a research project, except that there is research surrounding circ that just happens to use live babies, and apparently, circ is not covered in ethics classes or the social sciences when discussing inhumane, unnecessary medical procedures.
Here, then, is my post in my class’ discussion of the humane treatment of consenting volunteers — I thought my avid activist readers would enjoy a good Irish rant.
On the subject of human experiments, my activist ire is burning brightly, so you can ignore the entire rest of this post…. But if you’re brave….
Saying research on humans must be completely voluntary is great, but the reality is that is not what happens in the United States on one particular kind of “research”. Non-consensual human research does in fact still happen. In the United States, routine infant circumcision (RIC) on baby boys occurs on a daily basis — female genital cutting has been outlawed in the United States, but it is still practiced in some parts of the world. Both male and female genital mutilation are violations of a child’s basic human rights to body autonomy and self-determination.
While parents think they have the right to mutilate their sons, the boy himself actually has the only say in what happens to his body, especially when circumcision is an unnecessary cosmetic procedure. Even if the parents’ religion “requires” circumcision, the boy himself is too young to voice if he has chosen to join his parents’ religion. Thanks to the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, every American citizen is guaranteed the Freedom of Religion; and in the case of circumcision, boys have the right to Freedom FROM Religion. HIS body. HIS choice.
So why do I bring this up? (Besides the fact that I’m an intactivist — an activist for keeping boys’ and girls’ genitals intact.) When a child is circumcised, he may not receive any anesthesia — even if given a local anesthetic, it does not do much. The male foreskin has 20,000 – 30,000 nerves. Yes, he DOES feel it. If he isn’t screaming, he’s in shock. So, is this humane?
Circumcision is now being shown to hinder a baby boy’s desire to latch on during breastfeeding — the baby probably feels betrayed by the mother. New studies are showing that circ affects the way in which the neurological pathways grow and connect as well as the psychological development — it’s no coincidence that the most violent and misogynist countries in the world tend to practice routine infant circumcision — America is especially included!
I invite you to watch a video of circumcision on YouTube. If you can’t sit through it without wincing, ask yourself how HE feels — and why does our culture still do this to infants who are only days old? Is this humane?
Worse than all of this is that the foreskins aren’t just thrown away. The hospitals sell the amputated foreskins to research labs since animal research is no longer an accepted practice (and rightfully so!). The DNA and cells from the foreskins are used in research by bio-engineering and cosmetic companies. Cosmetic companies are looking for the “fountain of youth”, and they’ve found it in the mutilated genitals of non-consenting newborn babies. The next time you’re shopping for some anti-wrinkle cream, call the company — Mary Kay, SkinMedica, Cover Girl, etc. — and ask if they STILL use foreskin-derived cells in their products.
Interestingly, the buying and selling of body parts is illegal in the United States. I can’t sell a kidney or an ovary or even a length of my hair because it would be considered trading in body parts. And yet the medical system does exactly that — buying and selling the human body parts of non-consenting children and profiting handsomely from it. Must be nice to own the FDA like that.
Over the course of its use and being sold and re-sold and then put into over-priced facial creams, one baby foreskin can eventually be worth $100,000. So everyone from the doctor to the hospital, to the labs, to the bio-medical and cosmetic companies gain big returns for stealing parts of a boy’s body, and yet the boy loses — so much more than just the foreskin.
Think circumcision prevents AIDS? It doesn’t. Prevents infections? It doesn’t. Looks “better”? No, it doesn’t. The studies done in Africa were skewed from the beginning, and a recent study showed higher HIV rates among circ’d men than intact. In fact, the foreskin contains special cells — Langerhans cells — and according to Nature Medicine magazine, “Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells.” The foreskin is not supposed to retract until it is ready to, usually around the onset of puberty; the foreskin actually protects the penis from infections. The foreskin also keeps the head of the penis smooth and soft, unlike circ’d glans that tend to look dry and cracked and develop keratinization (thickening of skin similar to scar tissue) from rubbing up against the boy’s/man’s clothes.
It is also estimated that 60% of erectile dysfunction in adult men is due to routine circumcision that was done when they were newborns. While the foreskin itself is small when it is amputated during RIC, once the boy grows into a man, the amount of skin removed equates to about 15 square inches of penile skin, including the frenulum (of the frenular delta) which is the most nerve-dense part of the foreskin.
Women who have been sexually active with intact men say there is a difference in the way intact men approach sex. These men seem to be more sensitive to the woman and more aware of what is happening in her vagina than cut men are. The foreskin mucosa also acts as natural lubricant. I can attest that men who have been circ’d have problems expressing themselves emotionally and in bed. Many cut men need “dry sex” to feel friction against the scar tissue (keratinization) on the underside of the penis in order to reach ejaculation. Dry sex is painful for women, but I can also attest that women don’t want to hurt the man’s feelings; and so, we endure painful sex so as not to further damage the man’s self-esteem. (Note: Not all circ’d men need dry sex “to feel something”, but many do, and many circ’d men have fulfilling sex lives.)
At Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio, a study is being done on 200 newborn boys who are being mutilated to determine which of two circumcision clamps is “better.” This “better” clamp will be determined subjectively by seeing which clamp produces fewer blood-soaked bandages and by judging the amount of pain expressed on the babies’ faces. Again, when did these boys give consent to participate in this study? Is this a humane study? Doesn’t this violate the National Research Act of 1974?
Circumcision can cause all sorts of problems from infections to damage to the meatus and urinary tract. And there is even a consequence called “degloving”, in which the doctor accidentally removes ALL of the skin from the baby boy’s penis. Yes, this happens often enough that there is a name for it.
If all of this were not bad enough, on average, 117 baby boys die each year in the United States from “routine” circumcision. If a diet pill caused 117 deaths each year, the FDA would ban it. And yet, circumcision is “routine”.
So why, then, is it not outlawed? Because some people are afraid of offending people of Jewish culture — however, few Americans would be afraid to offend Muslims, who also practice circumcision. A person can be proud to be of Jewish culture and NOT circumcise their son, who may or may not choose to join Judaism as his chosen religion, if any. A baby cannot voice that he does or does not want to be Jewish (in religion), so whatever his parents’ religion might be is superfluous. (Again, I point out the freedom FROM religion guaranteed to every American citizen.) Added to that, the “ritual nick” that is supposed to be the “bris” is NOT what is “routinely” done by skinning the penile glans of its protective barrier, the foreskin. Circumcision as it is practiced in America today is actually the modus operandi from the sexually repressed Victorian age, who touted circumcision — to the otherwise intact population — as a means of preventing boys from masturbating. But if you’re interested in the Jewish perspective of RIC, check out JewsAgainstCircumcision.org.
For more information on the erroneous myths and so-called science behind the pro-circ propaganda, visit IntactAmerica.org, Circumstitions.com, and similar — and for those in the SanFran area: BayAreaIntactivists.org.
As a tribute to the natural penis, I asked intact men to submit photos of their penis in various states to help women (and other men) get accustomed to what a natural penis looks like, and I wrote this article on my blog (warning: it’s NSFW :-) ). If you’re on Twitter, you can ask a question about circumcision, and be sure to use the hashtag #i2 to reach out to the #nocirc intactivists. To learn more about the history of circumcision, how it’s done, and consequences, watch “Circumcision: The Whole Story” (also NSFW).
Activist rant is complete… for now…. :-)
December 1, 2013 | Categories: activism, anatomy, body image, body mutilation, bullying, circumcision, erection, male orgasm, male perspective, OpEd, politics, reclaiming sexuality, sexual abuse, sexual health | Tags: circumcision, ethics, human rights, humane, penis, research, routine infant circumcision, sexual health, social sciences, United States | 3 Comments
We discussed his current work, I Am Harvey Milk, which is based on the life, work, and assassination of gay activist Harvey Milk. The choral work is set to have its premiere this month with the 300-voice San Francisco Gay Men’s Chorus, starring Andrew Lippa himself as Harvey Milk along with Tony Award winner Laura Benanti.
Andrew also gave me a SCOOP about his fabulous show, The Wild Party, which I absolutely adore! So listen to the replay if you missed the live show.
You can listen to the replay here.
Andrew Lippa wrote the music and lyrics for the upcoming Broadway musical Big Fish which opens in October, 2013. He also wrote the Tony-nominated music and lyrics for the Broadway musical The Addams Family as well as the music for the Broadway production of Aaron Sorkin’s new play The Farnsworth Invention. Other musicals include Asphalt Beach, The Wild Party, A Little Princess, jon & jen, and You’re A Good Man, Charlie Brown. Andrew was music director for Kristin Chenoweth’s sold-out shows at the Metropolitan Opera House and Carnegie Hall. His accolades include a Tony and Grammy nomination, the Gilman/Gonzalez-Falla Theater Foundation Award, ASCAP’s Richard Rodgers/New Horizons Award, The Drama Desk, and The Outer Critics Circle Award.
If you’re in the San Fran area this month, you can get tickets to I Am Harvey Milk’s premiere choral concert at IAmHarveyMilk.com.
And stay tuned for the release of the cast album — I will definitely post it here when it is released!
Check out the replay at the link above or catch it and all replays of ArousedWoman Radio with Trish Causey on the main website, ArousedWoman.com.
June 13, 2013 | Categories: activism, AW Radio, awakening, bullying, LGBT, politics, RADIO, reclaiming sexuality | Tags: activism, Broadway, choral work, chorus, composer, equality, gay men, gay rights, LGBT, Musical Theatre, San Francisco | Leave a comment